Pages

Thursday 27 January 2011

Who's to blame for Andy Gray's dismissal?

Andy Gray, Scottish footballer turned sports c...Andy Gray. Stupid, yes, but is he the victim of a bigger plot?
So, the recent sacking of Sky Sports pundit Andy Gray has perhaps raised more question than it has solved, and has led many to question the attitudes to sexism in this country.

Viewing/listening to the tapes, it is clear that Andy Gray's attitudes to women are , shall we say, less than enlightened.  The first to be revealed, was the rant about referee's assistant Sian Massey not knowing the offside rule, due apparently, to her having double the number of X-chromosomes as they did (and arguably three time the humility and four times the intelligence).  The fact that it was Richard Keys, and not Andy Gray who was arguable leading the discussion seems to have passed most people by.  Who amongst us, except maybe the most ardent supporters/critics of a point of view, can truly say that we have always stood up to an opinion we disagree with?  I am ashamed to say that barely ten months ago, in a discussion anout the looming election, a colleague of mine said "I'm gonna vote BNP this time.  I'm sick of all these fuckin' pakis round 'ere" and I didn't challenge her, merely mumbling some non-committal nothings in response.  Sure, when my friend attacked her opinion I joined in, but I had it just been me and her, I'd have just sat and listened to her racist tirade.  Didn't want to rock the boat you see?  How very English of me.

Then we learned on a second tape, apparently recorded off-air last December, in which Andy, whilst arranging his audio equipment in preparation for the live broadcast, asks if co-presenter Charlotte Jackson would mind tucking his into his trousers.  Again, this, to me, seems to be banter, although it must be said, Charlotte doesn't appear to be too happy about these comments.

Then, further footage was leaked from before the Wolves vs Liverpool game, in which Andy Gray and Andy Burton were seen discussing the physical appearance of Sian Massey, and finally, we saw an off-air discussion about one of Jamie Redknapp's ex-girlfriends, in which Richard Keys remarks that "you'd definitely smash it" and that you could "go round any night to find Redknapp hanging out the back of it".



However, the backlash which has followed (more on that later) is far more dangerous, and threatens to set back much of the progress that has been made in recent years.  Much of it centres on television programmes like 'Loose Women':  "99% of men would talk that way in the presence of other men (in Key's instance)" says Lee (Swansea) - the highest-rated comment on this Daily Mail article.  "so women are not sexist then? May i suggest you go and watch Loose Women" says Shane (south east) the second-highest rated comment.  This is to cloud the issue.  Whilst these day men are discriminated against in some areas - child custody being one area - overwhelmingly, it is women who have the rougher deal - lower pay, poorer standard of living etc.

All of this footage thought seem to have somehow been leaked by Sky, so I guess the only real lesson to be learned from this whole situation is this:  If the company you work for and the company you're suing have the same Parent Company - keep your nose clean.

Friday 21 January 2011

Johnson out, Balls in!

Well, it's been said many times before that a week is a long time in politics, and that being the case, the past five weeks I've neglected this blog seem even longer!

Since my last post, we've learned that the Culture Secretary is a cunt (please do listen again!), Some people do indeed still want to be Lib Dems, Tunisians are not the same as those other mad democracy-hating arabs, and the NHS would be far better off privatised (well, it may at least stop all those consultants playing the system by daring to work overtime).  Good good!

However long a week may seem though, a day can seem even longer, and over the past 24 hours, Alan Johnson has resigned from the Shadow Cabinet (to be replaced by Ed Balls and necessitating a reshuffle), Andy Coulson has quit as David Cameron's spin doctor, and Tony Blair is again giving evidence to the Chilcot Enquiry, almost a year after his first appearance.

Alan Johnson is the biggest shock for me.  Tabloid-style lurid affairs aside, I'd like to concentrate on the real issues here.  Will Johnson's replacement help or hinder the opposition Labour Party?

Personally, I think that the main issue here is the realignment of power within the shadow cabinet.  There was never any doubt that Mr Balls was better qualified for the Treasury portfolio than Mr Johnson - he had served under Gordon Brown's Chancellorship as his main aide and as Junior Minister, so one would have to assume that the initial appointment by Ed Miliband was a political decision in an attempt to hold more of the power (Miliband himself having studied economics, graduated from LSE and worked as Chairman of HM Treasury's Council of Economic Advisers under Brown's chancellorship), as he did not want a strong economist competing with him.

However, this reshuffle, whilst seemingly bad news to Mr Miliband, is probably good for the Labour Party as a whole.  Mr Balls is certainly a strong character, and will not be prone to some of the gaffes we had to endure from Mr Johnson.   Whilst he is also a divisive character, not well liked by even some within his own party (although one would suspect he'll be reasonably well liked by the Shadow Home Secretary!)  he has a strong fiscal brain and ought to provide the stiff opposition to George Osbourne that Mr Johnson could not.  Let Ed Miliband deal with the business of PR and winning over the public, and Ed Balls take battle on the economic ground.