Pages

Saturday 5 March 2011

Lib Dems wiped out in Barnsley

List of Parliamentary constituencies in South ...Bansley Central, within South Yorkshire.  Image from Wikipedia
So, Labour win in Barnsley Central  The Pope is Catholic and bears shit in the wood, so what?

However, that Dan Jarvis, a former member of the armed service, and previously unknown outside of his party, did it with an increased majority (11,771 from 11,093 last May) on a reduced turnout (36.5% from 56.5% in May) was a either damning assessment of this government, or a ringing endorsement of Ed Miliband (whose Doncaster North constituency is the most north-easterly shown on the image above) and the Labour Party  Or, just maybe, both. 

The unceremonious dumping (and imprisonment) of disgraced former Barnsley Central. MP Eric Illsley could have severely damaged the Labour Party in Barnsley, but it appears that the direction that the coalition government has taken over the past 10 months has caused more ire up the M1 than an expenses fraud ever could.  considering the scandal that the expenses row was, this is a big statement in itself.

General Election results in Barnsley Central
The real story however, is of the Liberal Democrats, who were severely punished at the ballot box on Thursday 3rd March.  Their excuse for the defeat in  the Saddleworth by-election, where Labour increased not only their majority, but also their absolute vote, and still in the face of a decreased turnout, was that "anti-Labour" support was solidifying behind the Tories as the best means to keep Labour out - tactical voting, if you will.  No such excuse could be used in Barnsley though, where support for both parties collapsed, dropping the Tories losing over 4,000 votes, remaining in third spot, and the Lib Dems haemorrhaging over 5,000 votes and dropping from second to 6th place, behind UKIP, who jumped to second from fifth, the BNP, whose vote halved, and an independent.

If Barnsley and Saddleworth are to be believe, and we do of course need to remember that by-elections are a special case, then AV or not, the Lib Dems could be virtually wiped out in the UK at the next election.  The only way to save themselves?  They need to reassert their centre-left roots.  In the meantime however, as long as they're in this Tory-led coalition, I fear for them.  They're sure to lose some key councils this May, my own in Sheffield, currently ruled as a Lib Dem Minority Cabinet, surely will be one of them, but I feel that all of the Metropolitan Boroughs (mostly large northern towns and cities) currently under Lib Dem overall or shared control will turn red this May.

Friday 4 February 2011

Sheffield Green Party speak against cuts

Anyone see Caroline Lucas on The Daily Politics recently? Sat alongside James Delingpole (yes, THAT James Delingpole, the one who was intelectually raped by Sir Paul Nurse), she was thrown the often-used criticism of the Green Party/Green Movement:  That she's a watermelon - Green on the outside, Red on the inside.  She of course, replied with the perfect repost:  "I've no problem with that James", were the last word she said before Andrew Neil had to move on to other topics.

That this is somehow a criticism is beyond me.  Socialist politics, taken to their logical conclusion, have to result in the adoption of green policies.  This week,a Sheffield Green, Bernard Little, made this speech to an anti-cuts rally.

Thursday 27 January 2011

Who's to blame for Andy Gray's dismissal?

Andy Gray, Scottish footballer turned sports c...Andy Gray. Stupid, yes, but is he the victim of a bigger plot?
So, the recent sacking of Sky Sports pundit Andy Gray has perhaps raised more question than it has solved, and has led many to question the attitudes to sexism in this country.

Viewing/listening to the tapes, it is clear that Andy Gray's attitudes to women are , shall we say, less than enlightened.  The first to be revealed, was the rant about referee's assistant Sian Massey not knowing the offside rule, due apparently, to her having double the number of X-chromosomes as they did (and arguably three time the humility and four times the intelligence).  The fact that it was Richard Keys, and not Andy Gray who was arguable leading the discussion seems to have passed most people by.  Who amongst us, except maybe the most ardent supporters/critics of a point of view, can truly say that we have always stood up to an opinion we disagree with?  I am ashamed to say that barely ten months ago, in a discussion anout the looming election, a colleague of mine said "I'm gonna vote BNP this time.  I'm sick of all these fuckin' pakis round 'ere" and I didn't challenge her, merely mumbling some non-committal nothings in response.  Sure, when my friend attacked her opinion I joined in, but I had it just been me and her, I'd have just sat and listened to her racist tirade.  Didn't want to rock the boat you see?  How very English of me.

Then we learned on a second tape, apparently recorded off-air last December, in which Andy, whilst arranging his audio equipment in preparation for the live broadcast, asks if co-presenter Charlotte Jackson would mind tucking his into his trousers.  Again, this, to me, seems to be banter, although it must be said, Charlotte doesn't appear to be too happy about these comments.

Then, further footage was leaked from before the Wolves vs Liverpool game, in which Andy Gray and Andy Burton were seen discussing the physical appearance of Sian Massey, and finally, we saw an off-air discussion about one of Jamie Redknapp's ex-girlfriends, in which Richard Keys remarks that "you'd definitely smash it" and that you could "go round any night to find Redknapp hanging out the back of it".



However, the backlash which has followed (more on that later) is far more dangerous, and threatens to set back much of the progress that has been made in recent years.  Much of it centres on television programmes like 'Loose Women':  "99% of men would talk that way in the presence of other men (in Key's instance)" says Lee (Swansea) - the highest-rated comment on this Daily Mail article.  "so women are not sexist then? May i suggest you go and watch Loose Women" says Shane (south east) the second-highest rated comment.  This is to cloud the issue.  Whilst these day men are discriminated against in some areas - child custody being one area - overwhelmingly, it is women who have the rougher deal - lower pay, poorer standard of living etc.

All of this footage thought seem to have somehow been leaked by Sky, so I guess the only real lesson to be learned from this whole situation is this:  If the company you work for and the company you're suing have the same Parent Company - keep your nose clean.

Friday 21 January 2011

Johnson out, Balls in!

Well, it's been said many times before that a week is a long time in politics, and that being the case, the past five weeks I've neglected this blog seem even longer!

Since my last post, we've learned that the Culture Secretary is a cunt (please do listen again!), Some people do indeed still want to be Lib Dems, Tunisians are not the same as those other mad democracy-hating arabs, and the NHS would be far better off privatised (well, it may at least stop all those consultants playing the system by daring to work overtime).  Good good!

However long a week may seem though, a day can seem even longer, and over the past 24 hours, Alan Johnson has resigned from the Shadow Cabinet (to be replaced by Ed Balls and necessitating a reshuffle), Andy Coulson has quit as David Cameron's spin doctor, and Tony Blair is again giving evidence to the Chilcot Enquiry, almost a year after his first appearance.

Alan Johnson is the biggest shock for me.  Tabloid-style lurid affairs aside, I'd like to concentrate on the real issues here.  Will Johnson's replacement help or hinder the opposition Labour Party?

Personally, I think that the main issue here is the realignment of power within the shadow cabinet.  There was never any doubt that Mr Balls was better qualified for the Treasury portfolio than Mr Johnson - he had served under Gordon Brown's Chancellorship as his main aide and as Junior Minister, so one would have to assume that the initial appointment by Ed Miliband was a political decision in an attempt to hold more of the power (Miliband himself having studied economics, graduated from LSE and worked as Chairman of HM Treasury's Council of Economic Advisers under Brown's chancellorship), as he did not want a strong economist competing with him.

However, this reshuffle, whilst seemingly bad news to Mr Miliband, is probably good for the Labour Party as a whole.  Mr Balls is certainly a strong character, and will not be prone to some of the gaffes we had to endure from Mr Johnson.   Whilst he is also a divisive character, not well liked by even some within his own party (although one would suspect he'll be reasonably well liked by the Shadow Home Secretary!)  he has a strong fiscal brain and ought to provide the stiff opposition to George Osbourne that Mr Johnson could not.  Let Ed Miliband deal with the business of PR and winning over the public, and Ed Balls take battle on the economic ground.